« In re: "Those 'Happy Homos'" | Main | A Law Clerk Hiring Update: Nino Rocks Out! »

January 23, 2006


Key Observer

The commentor who bashes the judge in this post is an unhappy person who we must pray to be happy and not to bash article 3 heroes. Okay, K., we all luv ya, girl. Chill.

Dave Sheldon

I would place money that the jurist behind description #2 is Marsha Berzon of the 9th Circuit.


Censorship is in vogue, it seems! First Google, now A3G. Your "correspondent" has "powerful friends," it seems.


Having attended the lunch mentioned in item #2, I'd like to assure all and sundry that the incident was overblown. Indeed, the night before, along with another student, I had a drink with the judge at an on-campus restaurant. She was quiet, but charming. Perhaps your correspondent needs to relax.

Maureen Mahoney

Those errors were far from 'insignificant.' I can't help it if I'm smarter than everyone else.


Am I correct in assuming that the Judge from #1 is mentioned in the subsequent post? ;)


Am I correct in assuming that the Judge from #1 is one of those mentioned in a subsequent post?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)