UTR TipJar

Show A3G Love

Tip Jar

UTR Search

  •  
    Web underneaththeirrobes.blogs.com

Sponsored Links

Misc.




Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 06/2004

« Justice Joy Clement: "Happy Happy Joy Joy," or Justice Souter in a Dress? | Main | Judicial Hottie John Roberts Bound for One First Street? »

July 19, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455028f69e200d8348372ee69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference So Maybe It's NOT Judge Clement?:

Comments

Don Singleton

John G Roberts is the USSC Nominee. I had a lot of stuff for Edith Brown "Joy" Clement and a fair amount on J. Michael Luttig, but I got surprised by the nomination of John Roberts

http://donsingleton.blogspot.com/2005/07/john-g-roberts.html is my blog entry

Kate

The idea that the replacement for Justice O'Connor needs to be a woman is extraordinarily sexist. I'm sorry to see so many qualified judges left out of the selection process because they are male.
I think it is sad that the common opinion from NPR to the First Lady is that there is something about a 'woman qua woman' that should be taken into consideration when choosing a Justice to sit on the Supreme Court. One might have hoped that seeing two women sit on the bench who are as different as O'Connor and Ginsberg would have helped dispel some of this sexism.
That said, for reasons related to her intellectual and judicial positions, and not b/c of her gender, or race, I would love to see judicial diva, and long shot, Janice Rogers Brown promoted to the Court.
Thanks for all the work on this fabulous blog, keep the gossip coming!

Bill Cash

A3G, this is my first comment on your blog and I have to say I'm eagerly awaiting all updates! There has to be some fresh dish. I couldn't agree with you more, the SCOTUS needs a judicial diva!!!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Sponsored Link

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Law Blogs

Sponsored Links