UTR TipJar

Show A3G Love

Tip Jar

Misc.




Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2004

« Searching Underneath the Robes: "big ass clerks" | Main | Judicial SIGHT-ations: Better Late Than Never »

May 13, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455028f69e200d8342206c753ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Justice Thomas's OT 2005 Clerks:

» Stop the Penis Party! from Life, Law, Libido
John Hughes, to my knowledge, is not the guy who wrote all of the great 80's movies. But he may, in fact, be That Guy from "PCU." [Read More]

» Society Girls, Please! from De Novo
Readers who have gauged my politics may be a little surprised to know that I'm on the Federalist Society board at my law school. I took an interest in the organization since the beginning of the year because they offer... [Read More]

Comments

BSG

One of the following people is a Supreme Court Justice: Clarence Thomas, and "Reader."

Reader

CT is an absolute disgrace, for several reasons. Sleeping (which i have witness at _four_ arguments) during oral argument is incredibly rude -- sure, he may not find it valuable, but willing himself to stay awake for a couple of hours every few weeks should not be a difficult task.

His opinion in Hamdi is simply repellent. Ditto his Morrison concurrence, which is a laughable return to the primitive & formalistic legal reasoning of the 19th century (oh no, surely manufacture isn't commerce!)

His cigar smoking is also extremely obnoxious & an example of his disregard for others -- my understanding is that the SC has a special dispensation from the general Federal ban on smoking in Federal buildings, which permits him to puff stinkily away on his little death sticks, which (for him) has the added bonus of making cancer survivor Ginsburg retreat to an office on a different floor from the rest of the Justices.

And, of course, this doesn't address _any_ of the hideous (and very, very likely true) charges levelled at him during his confirmation hearings.

He should never have been appointed in the first place, and his unhinged jurisprudence since simply validates that conclusion.

boi

LOL!!!!!!!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

September 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Law Blogs